Web Analytics Made Easy -
StatCounter
Top 10 Rivalries In Car Industry

Top 10 Rivalries In Car Industry

Racing is often the source of the conflicts that seep into showrooms and enthusiasts have a tendency of escalating them by taking sides. With that said, rivalries are ultimately good for motorists because they force companies to surpass themselves year after year.

10. Bentley vs. Rolls-Royce

Rolls-Royce owned Bentley from 1931 to 1998 so the two companies competed on friendly grounds; their cars often used many of the same parts. Bentley began moving in a sportier direction after Vickers took over both brands in 1980 but it didn’t truly blaze its own path until it joined the Volkswagen empire in 1998. Rolls-Royce was briefly part of it, too, though a complicated latticework of deals put it under BMW’s watch.

22 years after the messy split, these two icons of British luxury have become bitter rivals in a number of market segments, including the hotly-contested SUV market. Bentley’s Mulsanne and Rolls-Royce’s Phantom (pictured) are among the most luxurious four-door models in the world but the former has recently left production. It’s a move that has left the Phantom in a class of one, at least for now.

9. Bugatti vs. Koenigsegg

The limited-edition Bugatti Veyron was certified as the world’s fastest production car when it reached 267mph in 2010. Koenigsegg toppled it in 2017 by sending an Agera RS to 278mph on a closed, 11-mile stretch of Nevada State Route 160. Bugatti couldn’t let this offensive go unanswered so it started designing an evolution of the Chiron (pictured) capable of effortlessly crushing the new record.

Bugatti became the first carmaker to break the 300mph barrier with a production-bound street-legal car when intrepid test driver Andy Wallace reached 304mph behind the wheel of a Chiron Super Sport 300+ in 2019. The company then exited the top speed race to focus on other projects it hasn’t fully detailed yet. In 2020, Koenigsegg unveiled an evolution of the Jesko named Absolut (pictured) capable of reaching 330mph, according to computer simulations, but it hasn’t found where to test it yet. Oddly, it also said its quest for speed is over regardless of whether it manages to snag the crown from Bugatti.

8. Ferrari vs. Ford

1966 Le Mans

The rivalry that opposes Ford and Ferrari was entertainingly documented by a movie named Le Mans ’66 in 2019. We won’t spoil it for you, but the premise is that Ford tried buying Ferrari, then an independent company, in the early 1960s but its delegation returned to Michigan empty-handed after the negotiations stalled. Executives then launched a no-holds-barred campaign to defeat and embarrass the Italian firm where it hurts most: on the track. Its first few attempts at victory failed but it finally captured first place in 1966 (pictured) with the help of Carroll Shelby (1923-2012). It won again in 1967, 1968, and 1969.

Its GTE-Pro-spec GT (pictured) narrowly beat Ferrari’s 488 GTE to win first-in-class, though the Porsche 919 Hybrid took first overall. Satisfied with its trophy, Ford announced plans to shutter its factory-backed endurance racing program after the 2019 season.

7. Audi RS 6 Avant vs. Mercedes-AMG E63

Mercedes-Benz initially didn’t see the appeal of putting a big engine in a car that looks like it belongs in the Ikea parking lot. The success of Audi’s first-generation RS 6 Avant, which traced its roots to the RS 2 Avant released in 1994, changed the company’s mind. It made the E63 available as a long-roof in 2007.

The competition continues 13 years later. The RS 6 Avant and the E63 both use a 4.0-litre, twin-turbocharged engine tuned to send about 600bhp to the four wheels. Autocar concluded the Audi lacks the AMG’s overall engagement but beats it as an everyday car. It’s a very, very close fight.

6. Ford Bronco vs. Jeep Wrangler

Ford will resurrect the long-dormant Bronco nameplate in 2020 on an off-roader aimed directly at the Jeep Wrangler. We’re surprised it’s taken this long; the Wrangler has been without a direct rival since the first-generation model made its debut in 1986Toyota’s FJ Cruiser came close but it wasn’t offered with a removable hard top, a defining feature in the constitution of the Wrangler’s character.

The countless leaks, reports and spy shots confirm the born-again Bronco will be a true Wrangler competitor. It will arrive as a burly, body-on-frame off-roader with a removable top, two- and four-door variants and a long list of accessories for owners who want to modify it. Its official debut is scheduled for the summer of 2020 and it’s expected to arrive in American showrooms for the 2021 model year.

5. Land Rover Series vs. Toyota Land Cruiser

Land Rover’s Series I (pictured), II and III models and the different variants of Toyota’s Land Cruisers took thousands of explorers to uncharted and inhospitable places from the 1950s to the 1970s. Their remarkable simplicity made them relatively quick and easy to mend with basic tools and their off-road capacity allowed them to trudge through terrain that stopped other 4x4s dead in their tracks.

Land Rover replaced the Series III with the 90/110 (which later became the original Defender) in 1983. Toyota pushed its do-it-all off-roader in a more modern direction when it launched the 70 Series Land Cruiser in 1984; it’s still produced in 2020, against all odds. The second-generation Defender introduced in 2019 doesn’t compete directly with the full-size Land Cruiser but some versions of it fall in the same segment as the smaller Land Cruiser Prado sold in numerous markets around the globe.

4.Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution vs. Subaru WRX STI

The rivalry between these two hallowed nameplates started in the World Rally Championship (WRC). Finnish pilot Tommi Mäkinen won the driver’s championship behind the wheel of a Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution in 1996, 1997, 1998 and 1999 while the Impreza (which wasn’t called WRX STI yet) earned Subaru the constructor’s title between 1995 and 1997. Both companies ultimately left rallying but the rivalry continued on the road and, significantly, in video games during the 2000s.

In 2020, the WRX STI (pictured) is the clear winner. It’s still in production, and the next-generation model is around the corner, while Mitsubishi stopped making the Lancer Evolution in 2016. We’ve heard reports the nameplate will return on an SUV but the Evo as we knew and loved it is long dead.

3. Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang

Ford caught America by surprise when it released the original Mustang in 1964. It was aimed at the Corvair but Chevrolet quickly concluded it needed to develop a new model to counter it. It launched the Camaro in late 1966 and the rivalry between these two nameplates has taken on epic proportions since.

In 2020, the Mustang and the Camaro are the last pony cars standing; they’re both in their sixth generation. They’re design-led, heritage-laced models available in a dizzying number of configurations. Buyers can order either as a coupe, as a convertible, with a reasonably efficient turbo four or with a huge V8. While they come standard with a manual transmission and rear-wheel drive, they’re available with the same basic 10-speed automatic transmission that Ford and General Motors developed jointly.

2. BMW vs. Mercedes-Benz

BMW and Mercedes-Benz spent decades minding their own business. While the former made (and raced) feisty family cars, the latter played in the luxury segment and elevated its image by manufacturing massive limousines driven by the world’s elite. Chinese ruler Mao Zedong (1893-1976) wouldn’t have been caught dead drifting a 2002 Turbo around a bend but he happily paraded in a 600 Pullman. The era of détente ended in the 1980s when BMW turned the luxury dial up and Mercedes took a fancy to sportiness.

1. Ferrari vs. Lamborghini

Ferruccio Lamborghini (1916-1993), a wealthy industrialist from northern Italy, launched the carmaker that bears his name in 1963 because he was tired of spending money on fixing his Ferrari. Lamborghini was envisioned as Ferrari’s arch nemesis before it even built its first car. Enzo Ferrari (1898-1988) may not have paid much attention to his rival’s first car, the 350GT, because high-end coupes made by small companies were a dime a dozen at the time but he couldn’t ignore the mid-engined Miura released in 1966; it changed the supercar segment forever. Ferrari’s first mid-engined, 12-cylinder road car arrived in 1973.

Ferrari is independent, though it was part of Fiat for decades, and Lamborghini has thrived under the Volkswagen umbrella since 1998.

Source: Autocar.co.uk

GM Defense/U.S. Army Infantry Squad Vehicle (ISV)

GM Defense/U.S. Army Infantry Squad Vehicle (ISV)

America’s Army infantry soldiers have mostly been getting around on foot, but they’re about to get a radical upgrade in the form of the Chevrolet Colorado ZR2-based Infantry Squad Vehicle.

Source: Motortrend.com

275 Horsepower, 420 Pound-Feet

The military generally runs on diesel fuel and the chemically similar JP-8 and F-24 fuels, so the ZR2’s 2.8-liter turbodiesel inline four-cylinder engine is modified to sense and adjust for these fuels automatically. Further improvements for ISV duty end up boosting output to 275 horsepower and 420 lb-ft of torque—89 more horses and 51 more lb-ft than stock. That’s almost all just tuning, largely made possible by tailoring it to suit the Army’s unique duty cycle and, um, more “lenient” emissions requirements. There is no NOx trap and hence no diesel emissions fluid, though no emissions controls are “defeated” per se and you won’t see ISVs “rolling coal.”

Source: Motortrend.com

How Quick Is The ISV?

The Army won’t share its figures but they would be meaningless anyway because they test at max 8,200-pound GVWR (5,000 max for the truck, 3,200 pounds for the nine troops and their gear). Motortrend tested two diesel trucks with six-speed automatic transmissions and similar weight-to-power ratings (18.0 lb/hp), which both did the zero-to-60-mph run in 6.9 seconds and ran the quarter-mile in just over 15 seconds at around 90 mph, so that’s a safe guess for how the ISV would fare in an official MotorTrend test with just the driver onboard. That’s well better than the 9.7 seconds to 60 and 17.2 seconds at 78.4 mph we’ve recorded on a stock ZR2 diesel.

Source: Motortrend.com

What Will The ISV Cost Taxpayers?

There are those who have merely taken the announced total contract award ($214 million) and divided by the initial 649 vehicles to come up with the golden-toilet-seat number $329,738. That’s utterly and completely wrong and misleading. All the Army would say on the record was that the “target average unit manufacturing cost” initially set for the program was $177,000, and we’re assured that GM came in “significantly under that.” You also need to know that the Army doesn’t purchase vehicles the way we do. It negotiates a price that incorporates lifetime service parts, user training, and a host of other unusual extras.

Source: Motortrend.com

Source: Motortrend.com

Source: Motortrend.com

Mercedes Will Hold 20% of Aston Martin by 2023

Mercedes Will Hold 20% of Aston Martin by 2023

Mercedes-Benz will increase its stake in Aston Martin to up to 20 percent from 2.6 percent as part of an expanded technology partnership between the automakers. Aston Martin will get access to advanced Mercedes technologies, including next-generation hybrid and electric powertrains, Mercedes said in a statement on Tuesday.

Mercedes will receive new shares in Aston Martin as part of the partnership. Mercedes said it will not increase its holding in Aston Martin beyond 20 percent. “We already have a successful technology partnership in place with Aston Martin that has benefited both companies. With this new expanded partnership we will be able to provide Aston Martin with access to new cutting-edge technologies and components,” Mercedes’ product strategy chief, Wolf-Dieter Kurz, said in the statement.

Aston Martin logo

In a release, Aston said the deal included “powertrain architecture (for conventional, hybrid, and electric vehicles) and future oriented electric/electronic architecture, for all product launches through to 2027.”

By expanding a tie-up with Mercedes that started in 2013, Aston Martin will spare its already stretched balance sheet from spending on a costly shift away from internal combustion engines. Mercedes will not put any cash into its partner. Supplying electric-car technology to Aston Martin will boost economies of scale beyond Mercedes’s own product range.

Aston Martin has struggled in the less than two years since going public, with high inventory and poor sales of its core sports cars undermining efforts to replicate Ferrari’s stock market success.

Canadian billionaire Lawrence Stroll bailed out the automaker early this year and Tobias Moers, the former head of Daimler’s Mercedes-AMG performance division, replaced Andy Palmer as Aston Martin’s CEO on Aug. 1.

Aston Martin will separately raise a total of about 1.3 billion pounds ($1.7 billion) through new bond and stock offerings, most of which will be used to refinance existing debt.

Source: Autocar.co.uk

Duster 2019 Headlights with 4 Colours (Boslla Bullet Review)

Boslla Bullet Series is working on a 3-color model for better adapting different weather conditions, such as clear night, rainy, snowy, foggy, smoggy, etc.

BOSLLA adopts a dual-color bullet patent design, silver represents white light and gold represents yellow light. With a dual color chip, it is the world’s first four-color headlight bulb.

BOSLLA uses 1.5mm super thin copper which makes the best low beam and high beam pattern and 6063 aviation aluminum for a better heat sink and a built-in 8500 RPM heat-dissipation fan, delivering twice the market‘s standard cooling performance.

No matter the projector or reflector which Boslla Bullet LED installed in, it has a good output on the Beam Pattern. Keep your way bright and NEVER dazzle oncoming cars.

 

It takes only 10 minutes to install and it’s plug and plays like a halogen bulb, we save your time.y bright and NEVER dazzle oncoming cars. Boslla Bullet Series has passed extreme withstand testing in water, icing, mud, sandstorm, and high temperature in the oven. It is the Swiss Army Knife in the automotive lighting industry. Here are the Specs:

WEIGHT 0.42 kg
DIMENSIONS 24 × 16 × 6 cm
BRAND Boslla
COLOR TEMPERATURE 6500K/4300K/3000K/Warning Flashing
WATT 30W/Bulb
LUMEN 7200LM/Set(3600LM/Bulb)
VOLTAGE DC 9-16V
IP RATING IP67
WARRANTY 1 Year
INSTALLATION Plug & Play
PACKAGE CONTENTS 2 BOSLLA LED + 2 BOSLLA Driver + 1 Product Manual

Watch my full review video to see a comparison between the boslla headlights and the stock ones.

BUY NOW!

New Armored Dacia Duster Prototype

New Military Dacia Duster

The new Duster comes painted from the factory and will have two main variants: army light 4×4 transport and drone scout platform.

Dacia Duster Trails, the group of adventure enthusiasts with the Romanian SUV, announces that the car will leave the assembly line from Mioveni with a body in the specific shades of the army. Two versions will be available. One of them, reserved for transport, will have Level 3 ballistic protection according to the STANAG standard for the body and Level 2 for the windows. The shield, offered as an option, is made after leaving the assembly lines and includes Kevlar, but also a series of hard steel panels. Dacia Duster will have a platform for drones and a rocket launcher.

The second version, a reconnaissance version, will benefit from the presence of a platform for launching drones. This version will have two seats. surprisingly, it can act like a real amphibian. It is completely waterproof and can – say those from Dacia Duster Trails – even float. It will have Level 4 armor in certain areas of the body, and the windows will come with Level 3 armor.
Dacia Duster reconnaissance can carry two attack drones and three reconnaissance drones. Attack drones can act as RO AG7 rocket launchers (RPG 7 produced under Romanian license) or can launch grenades. Drones can be fired from the rear of the vehicle when the rear sight is removed. They can communicate with each other through laser-based systems or with the help of copper wires. Radio communication should be avoided due to the risk of interception and interference. The project is being carried out in collaboration with a company specializing in the production of international defense electronics in Israel.

 

Source: Dacia Duster Trails & Technical